Technical Bulletin No.8 |
|
MONITORING ARSENIC IN WATER |
|
BackgroundThe exploitation of ground water to replace the use of surface water in the beginning of the 1970s was instrumental in reducing the incidence of water born diseases, and made an important contribution to the improvement of public health in many developing countries. Since then, the number of tube wells has been increasing. In Bangladesh alone, there are over six million wells. A more accurate figure is unavailable because the private sector has driven most of the shallow tube wells and records are incomplete. However, the improvement in water quality has been negatively affected by the presence of arsenic in ground water. The first study that reported the existence of arsenic in ground water was published in India in 1976. Further studies were carried out in India and neighbouring countries and raised concern among various governments, organizations and researchers. Severe poisoning can arise from the ingestion of as little as 100mg of arsenic trioxide. Chronic effects may result from the accumulation of arsenic compounds in the body at low intake levels. Arsenite (AsIII) is many times more toxic than arsenate (AsV). The maximum level of arsenic in irrigation water recommended by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) is 0.1 mg/L. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that the maximum level of arsenic in drinking water should not exceed 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb). Some countries still accept the level of 0.05 mg/L (50 ppb) in their national standards. However, some studies suggest that there is a high possibility of arsenic being taken in by plants from soil or irrigation water, which eventually transfers to humans. Further studies are needed, especially surrounding the effects of arsenic on main crops and vegetables. OccurrenceArsenic occurs naturally in sulphide minerals such as pyrite. It is found in many countries but especially those located south of the Himalayas, such as Bangladesh, India (West Bengal), and China. The main challenge in tackling arsenic in ground water is that it does not follow a specific pattern. For example, it can occur in one tube well and not in another one located less than 100 metres away. Furthermore, a tube well that was previously tested to show an acceptable amount of arsenic might test non-acceptable at a later date. It is therefore vital to test and monitor on a continual basis, with blanket coverage of all tube wells in those countries affected. It is equally important to ensure that people are made aware of the arsenic content in tube well water and promote arsenic mitigation activities. MonitoringMonitoring arsenic in ground water should be planned nationally, starting with random testing of tube wells throughout the country to determine the extent of the problem. Subsequently, blanket testing of all wells in selected districts should follow, to identify each and every contaminated well. Blanket testing programmes could also include other activities that are essential for additional monitoring and management operations, such as the location of each well using a Geographic Information System (GIS), the diagnosis of arsenicosis patients in the district surveyed, and the introduction of various water treatment measures in that district. Water testing for arsenic can either be done in a laboratory, where the water samples are delivered, or can be done using field testing kits. Each methodology has its own advantages and disadvantages that vary according to the resources available within each country. Laboratory testingAn assortment of methods is available to identify and determine levels of arsenic, arsenite and arsenate. The methods described below are considered standard by the American Water Works Association (AWA), the American Public Health Association (APHA) and the Water Environment Federation (WEF). These methods are listed in the “Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th edition, APHA, AWWA, WEF”. Regardless of how accurate these methods may be, test results will be
significantly affected by the condition of the sample that reaches the
laboratory. Samples must be in a good condition and truly representative.
Field testingField testing is an important tool for the extended or blanket testing and/or monitoring of arsenic. Several advantages can be achieved from implementing field testing. These include:
In recent years there have been many efforts to develop local testing kits further. Several studies have been conducted to evaluate various kits including many that are locally produced, resulting in some being accepted. Work is still ongoing in various countries to develop, test, and approve new field testing kits. Training of testing personnelFor all field testing kits, it is essential to ensure the technicians who will be performing the tests are properly trained. Training must be planned and implemented at the time of ordering the testing kit. Several kit manufacturers offer training programmes for local technicians. UNICEF Supply Division can assist in arranging these training programmes. Procedure for field testingIn most field testing kits, powdered zinc reacts with the acid (supplied either in liquid or powdered form, depending on the manufacturer and/or the kit) to create a reducing condition in the water sample, in which inorganic arsenic is reduced to arsine gas (AsH3). The arsine gas reacts with the mercuric bromide on the test strip to form mixed arsenic/ mercury halogenides that discolour the reaction zone of the test strip. The colour change ranges from yellow to brown, depending on the concentration of arsenic in the water. A comparison is made against the colour on the testing strip with a colour scale provided in the kit, to give a semi-quantitative value of the inorganic arsenic in the water. The various kits differ in their presentation of the reagents (liquid, powder, or tablets), the shape of the reaction vessel, the design of the reaction vessel cap where the testing strip or the filter is inserted, and the removal of the interference of sulphides. One of the kits offers a digital readout of the colour range instead of the visual comparison. Standard field testing kitsThe following standard kits are considered acceptable in most countries and can be ordered through UNICEF Supply Division, Copenhagen. This list does not imply that UNICEF endorses these kits only, or that UNICEF endorses the brand. UNICEF is open to consider any new kit that comes on the market and to share information and experience with partners. When new kits are accepted, they will be introduced into the UNICEF Supply Catalogue.
(Catalogue number - Description) 1) 0005500 - Arsenic testing kit (liquid reagents) This kit is manufactured by Merck KGaA, Germany.
2) 0005510 - Arsenic testing kit (powdered reagents) This kit is manufactured by Hach Company, Colorado, USA.
3) 0005520 - Arsenic test kit, highly sensitive This kit is manufactured by Merck KGaA, Germany.
4) 0005521 - EZ Arsenic test kit This kit is manufactured by Hach Company, Colorado, USA.
5) 0005522 - Visual Arsenic Detection Kit, 200 This kit is manufactured by Wagtech International Ltd. Berkshire, UK.
6) 0005523 - Digital Arsenator This kit is manufactured by Wagtech International Ltd. Berkshire, UK.
At this stage, renewables and accessory kits are not available as standard items in the UNICEF Supply Catalogue and are available from the manufacturer. UNICEF Supply Division can assist in procuring these kits upon request. For more details, please contact UNICEF Supply Division, at customer@unicef.org. Copyright © the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Supply Division, March 2004. |
|